Meet In CommonNews

Local

17-Year-Old Taken Into Custody In Killing Of Javits Frimpong. Mother And Family Meeting Rev. Sharpton And Attorney Ben Crump

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Black Star News

New York, NY (November 11, 2026) – The family of Javits Frimpong will be at the National Action Network’s House of Justice in Harlem today to react to the news that a 17-year-old was taken into custody in the shooting death of the 15-year-old. Rev. Al Sharpton, Founder and President of the National Action Network (NAN), and Attorney Ben Crump, who represents the family, will join them. The press conference began at 12:00 PM. A 17-year-old was taken into custody in the shooting death of 15-year-old Javits Frimpong. He was picked up for questioning by detectives on Wednesday morning and taken to the 42nd Precinct. No charges were immediately filed. More teens are being sought, and detectives are not yet clear on the 17-year-old’s role. Investigators have been looking for three teens who fled the area. Javits Frimpong, 15, a tenth-grade student at The DreamYard Preparatory School in the Bronx, was shot on his way to school on the morning of Thursday, October 29th.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Black Star News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Retailers should show a product's recent normal price alongside advertised discounts.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The buffet is unlimited while you are inside. Can one sandwich leave in your pocket?

An expensive hotel brunch advertises unlimited food but forbids takeout. You are full, yet quietly assembling a sandwich for later would cost the hotel almost nothing. Several trays will likely be discarded after service.

Does preventing waste justify ignoring the boundary of a bargain?

Explore this quandary