Meet In CommonNews

Local

3M settles chemical contamination claims for $7.35B, while admitting no guilt

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

MAPLEWOOD, Minn. — 3M, which is responsible for widespread groundwater contamination from so-called forever chemicals in the eastern Twin Cities metro, will pay $7.35 billion to settle the vast majority of outstanding personal injury claims against it. The Minnesota corporate behemoth and a group of plaintiffs’ lawyers announced the settlement on Nov. 3. As many as 120,000 people who say they were injured by PFAS and similar chemicals in firefighting foam, drinking water and other sources could be eligible for compensation under the agreement. The plaintiffs’ lawyers said the settlement was a long time in coming. “For the thousands of victims who have sought answers and accountability for nearly a decade, 3M’s $7.35 billion settlement is welcome news” and a “favorable result for victims who are in urgent need of support to cover the mounting medical bills and other costs frequently associated with toxic PFAS exposure,” attorneys Fred Thompson and David Hoyle said in a joint statement.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Developing young players can be more important than winning in the current season.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary