Meet In CommonNews

Local

【404维修站】从“中国间谍”到“竞争对手剑蝶”:对照《纽约时报》黄仁勋评论的中英文版本

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: China Digital Times

【404维修站】栏目旨在收录因为中国的言论审查或者在政治压力之下的自我审查而从文章或者书籍中删除或修改的词语、句子或章节。欢迎读者提供这类审查信息。 CDT 档案卡 标题:【404维修站】从“中国间谍”到“竞争对手剑蝶”:对照《纽约时报》黄仁勋评论的中英文版本 作者:中国数字时代 发表日期:2026.11.14 主题归类:404维修站 CDS收藏:公民馆 版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明。 2026年11月12日,《纽约时报》发表了美国记者斯蒂芬·威特(Stephen Witt)针对英伟达公司创始人黄仁勋的评论文章,分析黄仁勋的近日曝光的性丑闻和辞职风波。同日,微信公众号“一半杯”发表了文章的中文编译版,并在文末注明对原文部分内容进行了“策略化改写”。“一半杯”是一个在微信平台上活跃的资讯与文章翻译分享类公众号,主要编译、转发国际主流媒体的深度报道、人物传记及商业评论文章。 CDT编辑对照英文原文发现,中文版整体忠实于原文,但译文将《纽约时报》原文提到的“中国”“中国间谍”等表述替换为隐晦措辞,删去了涉及70亿美元英伟达设备涉嫌走私至中国,以及美国国务卿鲁比奥因批评中国而被禁止入境等信息。以下整理了中文编译版与英文原文之间的主要差异: 将“中国间谍”改写成“竞争对手剑蝶” 英文原文: a woman who U.S. intelligence determined is a Chinese spy 中文译文: 其中一名女子被美国情报机构认定为竞争对手剑蝶 忠实翻译应为: 其中一名女子被美国情报机构认定为中国间谍。 删除了涉及70亿美元英伟达设备走私的指控 英文原文: A recent report in The Information suggests they were used as a way station to illicitly smuggle some $7 billion of equipment into China.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at China Digital Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

New local ventures should actively contribute to the surrounding community.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You know the relationship is over, but the vacation is nonrefundable. Do you wait to break up?

You have decided to end a year-long relationship. In five days, you are both leaving on an expensive vacation that cannot be refunded or transferred. Your partner is excited and believes the relationship is thriving.

Can avoiding financial waste justify delaying a painful truth?

Explore this quandary