Meet In CommonNews

Local

澳家庭黑五支出預計增加42億 總消費890億

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Epoch Times

【大紀元2026年11月13日訊】(大紀元記者陳光澳洲悉尼編譯報導)隨著「黑色星期五」(Black Friday)促銷季的臨近,越來越多的澳洲消費者選擇在此期間搶購優惠商品,以應對持續高企的生活成本。 最新分析顯示,澳洲家庭預計會在今年黑五期間增加購物支出,全國範圍的相關消費額將會增加42億澳元。 據News24新聞網報導,購物返現平台PRX Vault對澳洲統計局(ABS)消費者和消費數據的最新分析顯示,今年黑五促銷季,澳洲家庭的購物支出預計平均會額外增加390澳元,消費總額增加42億澳元,達到890億澳元。 分析顯示,在黑五促銷活動在澳洲興起之前,澳洲家庭11月的消費額通常僅比月均水平高出約4%。如今,這一比例已升至9%。 PRX Vault創始人布朗(Antini Brown)表示,服裝和鞋類的銷量通常會在黑五期間激增。去年11月,此類商品的銷售額增長了34%。 他表示,消費者如果希望買到真正划算的商品,可以重點關注黑五期間的服裝和鞋類促銷。 但他同時表示,對於家用電器和電子產品而言,黑五未必是最佳購買時機,因為聖誕促銷期間,這類商品的價格會更低。 PRX Vault的分析顯示,11月份小型家電的價格比平均水平高出2.4%,而到了12月則低3.7%。 大型家電在12月份的價格比平時低3%,電子產品則便宜3.3%。 布朗表示,過去兩年,家電和電子產品在12月份的價格平均比11月份低3%至6%,因此消費者如果不急於購買,不妨等到聖誕促銷季再出手。 PRX Vault的分析發布之際,澳洲家庭正面臨持續多年的通脹壓力。 過去五年來,通貨膨脹一直居高不下,給整體經濟帶來了巨大壓力,迫使澳洲儲備銀行自2022年以來加息18次。本月早些時候,澳儲銀宣布將現金利率上調0.25個百分點至4.85%,創下自2008年全球金融危機以來的18年新高。 責任編輯:岳明 了解更多澳洲即時要聞及生活資訊,請點擊 dajiyuan.com.au (本文未經許可不得轉載或建立鏡像網站)

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Epoch Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

New community initiatives should have a realistic long-term support plan before launching.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You inherit a fortune made in ways you despise. Can you keep it?

You inherit a substantial sum from a relative who accumulated it through practices you consider exploitative. Keeping it would improve your family's security; donating it could support people harmed by similar practices.

Can ownership be morally clean when its history is not?

Explore this quandary