Meet In CommonNews

Local

7 H-2B workers approved for employers classified in Transportation and Warehousing at Louisiana worksites in fiscal 2026 through June 30, 2026

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Arizona Business Daily

There were 7 H-2B worker approvals for employers classified in Transportation and Warehousing with worksites recorded in Louisiana in fiscal 2026 through June 30, 2026, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. USCIS approved all 7 decided workers for these employers, resulting in an approval rate of 100%. The count covers 2 petitioners named in the data. These figures represent workers included in USCIS initial approval and denial decisions on H-2B petitions, not counts of petitions or visas or individual people. The worksite location comes from the address recorded on the linked Labor Department labor certification, not from where the employer is based. The industry classification reflects the two-digit NAICS sector of the employer on that certification and does not describe the workers' occupation. The data cover fiscal 2026 through June 30, 2026, a partial year.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Arizona Business Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Expanding universities should help pay for the pressures they create on surrounding neighborhoods.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A private joke from years ago goes public. How long should it follow the person who wrote it?

Someone shares a screenshot of a tasteless joke made years ago in a private friends' chat. The person who wrote it says they were performing for a small audience, have changed, and never agreed to have the message made public.

How private should speech remain when it reveals something troubling?

Explore this quandary