Meet In CommonNews

Local

A Different Perspective: Veterans Day

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Commercial-News

By John R. Nay Readers may remember that I ended last week’s article by writing “After this unnecessarily bitter election, it would be nice if we could stop the name-calling” and instead recall the statement by the owner of the Milwaukee Brewers about the people of Wisconsin emphasizing their “feelings of community.” The political campaign that just ended included way too much ugliness. The creators, printers, publishers, and broadcasters of many ads should feel embarrassed (at least) or ashamed. It’s time to use words with their true meanings and stop throwing around terms like “extremists” when the real bottom line is simply that you don’t agree with someone on some political issues. On Election Day, I worked at the election polls in Sodus Township, while my wife worked in Oronoko Township. I was reminded that day of a fellow columnist’s comment that “[someone’s] vote counts just as much as his own vote. He’s right, of course.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Commercial-News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Employers should measure outcomes instead of continuously monitoring workers' activity.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary