Meet In CommonNews

Local

A giving campaign to help people who have lost SNAP benefits

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: New York Amsterdam News

Since the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act went into effect in July 2025, more than 5 million people have lost federal food assistance benefits, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). Economists’ predictions were that the major cuts, along with new work requirements, would affect most of the roughly 42 million people who use the benefits to keep food on the table each month. However, the numbers show that the effects of the Trump administration’s cuts are happening even faster than estimated. More people have lost benefits more quickly than even the Congressional Budget Office predicted they would, according to the CBPP. “The last time there was such a steep decrease in participation (other than temporary spikes after natural disasters) was nearly three decades ago, after Congress enacted deep cuts to SNAP (then the Food Stamp Program) in 1996,” said the CBPP.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at New York Amsterdam News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Public spaces should allow peaceful disagreement while preventing intimidation.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your new television goes on sale elsewhere. Can you return it and buy the identical one cheaper?

A week after buying a television, another store offers the same model for much less. Your retailer refuses to match the price but allows unopened-looking returns. You could carefully repack the perfectly functional set.

Is a generous return policy permission to reverse a deal for any reason?

Explore this quandary