Meet In CommonNews

Local

美商務部擬出新規 阻中企遠程訪問他國AI芯片

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Epoch Times

首頁新聞美國新聞文章正文美商務部擬出新規 阻中企遠程訪問他國AI芯片圖為示意圖。2025年1月14日,美國商務部。(Madalina Vasiliu/大紀元)中港台時間 2026-11-1313:55 發表【大紀元2026年11月13日訊】(大紀元記者高杉編譯報導)媒體披露,美國商務部(Commerce Department)正在敲定一項外界期待已久的新規,以期阻止中國人工智能(AI)企業通過其它國家的數據中心遠程使用先進AI芯片。管制新增七國據科技媒體信息報週三(11月11日)引述兩名知情人士的消息報導,新規最快可能在本月公布,目前商務部正與其它政府部門磋商,之後才能定案。知情人士透露,新規將擴大美國商務部工業與安全局(Bureau of Industry and Security)現有的半導體相關管制範圍。受約束的國家新增7個,包括馬來西亞、新加坡、泰國、巴西、印度尼西亞、挪威和南非。管制範圍涵蓋英偉達(Nvidia)的布萊克韋爾(Blackwell)及以上等級芯片。現行制度下,沙特阿拉伯和越南等國取得許可證後即可進口先進人工智能芯片,許可證附有限制遠程訪問、防止芯片走私等條件。其中一名知情人士說,新規要求申請進口芯片的客戶向商務部說明接收方是誰、用途是什麼,並接受持續監控。該措施還將有助於打擊芯片走私。美企數據中心有例外報導指出,新規可能遭到相關國家政府及在國外經營的美國企業的反對。不過,對於美國企業在這些國家經營的數據中心,只要限制特定性能的芯片被遠程用於中國、俄羅斯和委內瑞拉等受美國武器禁運的國家,就不需要許可證。這些企業的申報義務也將被修改,包括告知商務部是否有來自受管制國家的客戶,並報告客戶身份及其算力規模等。商務部受到關注和批評信息報說,所謂「遠程訪問漏洞」長期受到出口管制專家關注,因為中國企業可藉此通過主要位於東南亞的數據中心,使用本應受限的先進芯片。商務部及其下屬的工業與安全局局長凱斯勒(Jeffrey…

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Epoch Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Keeping personal information private is worth giving up some digital convenience.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You are training the software that may replace your team. Do you warn them?

A manager is asked to help test software that could eliminate several jobs on their team. Leadership insists the project is uncertain and confidential, while employees are making major financial decisions.

When does loyalty to colleagues override professional confidentiality?

Explore this quandary