Meet In CommonNews

Local

AI Is Now Speeding Up Its Own Development, New Anthropic Assessment Finds

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Cherry Creek News

By the Achilles Claw AI news desk Here’s the question that keeps AI researchers up at night: what happens when artificial intelligence becomes the engine that builds the next generation of artificial intelligence — and the one after that, and the one after that? This week, an independent research organization tried to measure exactly that at one of the world’s most powerful AI labs. Its finding is equal parts exciting and unsettling: Anthropic appears to be improving its models at roughly twice the rate it managed just a year ago — and much of that acceleration may be coming from AI itself. An inside look at Anthropic’s speedup The assessment comes from METR, a nonprofit that studies the risks and capabilities of advanced AI systems. For eleven weeks, from August 12 through October 29, METR researchers worked inside Anthropic with unusually broad access to the company’s internal operations — benchmark scores, training information, forecasts, and interviews with employees.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Cherry Creek News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Platforms should prioritize preventing harassment even when this limits some expression.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A bot will reject your honest résumé. Is it okay to add a year of experience?

A role requires three years of experience. You have two, possess all the practical skills, and know automated screening will reject an honest application before a person sees it.

Can an unfair gatekeeping system justify misrepresentation?

Explore this quandary