Meet In CommonNews

Local

Alaska voters on track to reject 2 Kenai judges in initial election results

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Alaska Beacon

Alaska voters in the Third Judicial District opted to reject two state judges standing for retention in the midterm election by wide margins in initial results on Tuesday. The vote comes after the non-partisan Alaska Judicial Council — charged with vetting and nominating judges, as well as conducting performance evaluations — issued a rare recommendation for voters not to retain the two judges in this election. They were the only two they recommended not be retained out of 21 judges standing for retention elections. For another Juneau judge, they issued no recommendation. Voters opting to retain Kenai Superior Court Judge Kelly Lawson and District Court Judge Martin Fallon were outnumbered by “no” votes, according to initial results released by the Alaska Division of Elections. As of Wednesday, 58% of voters voted “no” to retain Lawson, and 41.8% voted “yes” — a 16 point margin, or 19,939 vote split.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Alaska Beacon

Featured places to meet in Kenai, AK

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

City guide for Kenai, AK

Community Poll

Governments should explain openly what they gave up in negotiated compromises.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Everyone exaggerates on dating apps. Are two imaginary inches harmless?

A friend adds two inches to their listed height because they believe filters exclude them before personality has a chance. They plan to be charming enough that a date will not care once they meet in person.

Can deception be a fair response to superficial gatekeeping?

Explore this quandary