Meet In CommonNews

Local

Alders Back Bid For Local Power To Ban Nips

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: New Haven Independent

A Board of Alders committee unanimously backed a resolution Thursday night asking state lawmakers to let New Haven and other Connecticut cities and towns ban the sale of nips — the tiny liquor bottles that litter city streets, parks, and storm drains. The City Services and Environmental Policy (CSEP) Committee voted 6–0 to send the resolution to the full Board of Alders. If the board approves it, the request goes to the state legislature and the governor. “It’s a request for enabling legislation,” said Kathy Fay, who presented the resolution at City Hall with fellow environmental advocate Laura Cahn. “It’s not asking that the alders immediately move to banning in New Haven. It’s giving the alders that option, which they don’t have.” The resolution would not ban nips in New Haven. Under state law, cities and towns can’t prohibit nip sales on their own. The resolution asks the Connecticut General Assembly to pass a law giving each municipality the option.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at New Haven Independent

Featured places to meet in New Haven, CT

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Havenly

Havenly 25 Temple Street New Haven, CT, USA

Pad Thai

Pad Thai Park Street New Haven, CT, US

9 Squared

9 Squared 20 Dwight Street New Haven, CT, 06511 US

City guide for New Haven, CT

Community Poll

Public arts funding should prioritize access over attracting the largest audiences.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your partner checks your location whenever you reply slowly. Is that caring or creepy?

A couple shares live phone locations for convenience and safety. One partner begins checking the map whenever a message goes unanswered, even though they have never agreed on when checking is appropriate.

Does granting access also grant permission to monitor?

Explore this quandary