Meet In CommonNews

Local

Alex Murdaugh wants murder indictments dismissed, saying agent lied to grand jury

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Pike County News Watchman

Attorneys for Alex Murdaugh are expected in court Friday to ask a judge to throw out the original murder indictments for killing his wife and son. Now they're saying the chief investigator in the case lied to the grand jury.Murdaugh is facing a retrial on the murder charges after the South Carolina Supreme Court threw out his convictions and life sentence, ruling that a court clerk improperly influenced jurors against him during his 2023 trial.Even if the longshot request to dismiss the indictments is granted by Judge Debra McCaslin at Friday's pretrial hearing, it may not stop or even postpone an April retrial for the disgraced lawyer.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Pike County News Watchman

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Institutions should demonstrate equal treatment through people's actual experiences, not just written policies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The buffet is unlimited while you are inside. Can one sandwich leave in your pocket?

An expensive hotel brunch advertises unlimited food but forbids takeout. You are full, yet quietly assembling a sandwich for later would cost the hotel almost nothing. Several trays will likely be discarded after service.

Does preventing waste justify ignoring the boundary of a bargain?

Explore this quandary