Meet In CommonNews

Local

All Cook County circuit judges on track to win retention, but three face narrow margins

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Injustice Watch

This story is developing. Follow the latest results on our live retention election tracker. All 60 Cook County circuit judges up for retention are on track to keep their seats for another six years — but three hover just above the 60% threshold needed, according to preliminary results from the Cook County clerk and the Chicago Board of Elections. All three judges who hold slim margins as of Wednesday morning received negative ratings from at least one of the 14 local bar associations that review judicial performance. Judge Tiesha L. Smith, who was subject to seven negative bar association ratings, held 61.79% “yes” votes as of Wednesday morning, with votes left to count in a few dozen city precincts and mail-in ballots not yet tallied. The margins were similarly tight for Judge Ursula Walowski, who stands at 62.12%, and for Judge Lorraine Mary Murphy, who stands at 63.11%, per preliminary results.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Injustice Watch

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

An institutional apology should include a concrete plan to prevent repetition.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous gift could inspire millions more if you reveal your name. Do you?

A donor wants to make a transformative gift without recognition. The charity believes announcing the gift and the donor's identity would encourage matching contributions and help far more people.

Can the opportunity to create more good outweigh a preference for privacy?

Explore this quandary