Meet In CommonNews

Local

Another bill to release Epstein files headed to House floor

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Roll Call

Massie will force another vote on releasing files in the Jeffrey Epstein case. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call file photo) By Nina Heller Posted November 11, 2026 at 2:52pm As Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., enters his final weeks in Congress, he is one step closer to another vote on legislation related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A discharge petition led by Massie aimed at extracting more files from the Justice Department has now received enough support to force a vote on the House floor. Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., was the decisive 218th signature on the discharge petition, a procedural tool allowing rank-and-file House members to register their support for a piece of legislation and circumvent leadership to force a vote. Massie and other supporters of the effort say the bill is a bid for transparency. Earlier this week, Massie said his pitch to his colleagues was simple.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Roll Call

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Local communities should have more freedom to set their own rules.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your new television goes on sale elsewhere. Can you return it and buy the identical one cheaper?

A week after buying a television, another store offers the same model for much less. Your retailer refuses to match the price but allows unopened-looking returns. You could carefully repack the perfectly functional set.

Is a generous return policy permission to reverse a deal for any reason?

Explore this quandary