Meet In CommonNews

Local

ARREST REPORTS – FRANKLIN

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Daily Iberian

FRANKLIN CITY POLICE The following were booked into the parish jail: NOVEMBER 4 Milton Green Jr., 39, Willow Street, Franklin. Resisting an officer; obscenity; remaining where forbidden. NOVEMBER 6 Jonelle Waltman, 61, Ash Street, Franklin. Possession of schedule II narcotics – methamphetamine; possession of drug paraphernalia; possession of a legend drug without a prescription; violation of controlled dangerous substance law – drug free zone; operating a vehicle while license is suspended; no turn signal. NOVEMBER 7 Henry Jack, 52, Iberia Street, Franklin. Disturbing the peace by language; failure to appear. NOVEMBER 8 Carl Joseph Jr., 33, Curtis Drive, Franklin. Remaining where forbidden. NOVEMBER 9 David Norris, 58, Roseville Street, Franklin. Schedule II narcotics – methamphetamine – with intent to distribute; possession of drug paraphernalia.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Daily Iberian

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Interviewers should challenge powerful guests even when doing so risks losing future access.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You wear an expensive outfit once and return it spotless. Clever or dishonest?

You buy an expensive outfit for a single event, keep it spotless, and return it the next day. The store's generous policy allows returns without asking whether an item was worn.

Does exploiting a policy differ from breaking a rule?

Explore this quandary