Meet In CommonNews

Local

Arrival Ending Explained: Why Louise Still Chooses Hannah

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: BGodInspired

Read Time:12 Minute, 15 Second The first words of Arrival are spoken over a hospital bed. A mother tells her daughter she used to think this was the beginning of her story. Then we watch a girl grow up in a handful of cuts, get sick, and die. The light is grey. The house is quiet. By the time Louise Banks walks into an empty lecture hall, we think we know who she is: a woman who lost a child and went back to work. We are wrong about almost all of it. That is not a trick. It is the whole film. If you came here for the Arrival ending explained, the short answer is this. The girl in the opening has not been born yet. Louise is not remembering her. She is seeing her. And once she knows exactly how that life ends, she chooses it anyway. The long answer is better, because the way Denis Villeneuve’s 2016 film gets you there is the most careful piece of structure in any science fiction film of its decade. What the Arrival ending actually means Twelve ships appear around the world.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at BGodInspired

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

People's reported experiences should matter as much as official service-performance targets.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The restaurant forgot your expensive entrée. Do you point it out?

After a crowded dinner, you notice the restaurant omitted your most expensive entrée from the bill. Service was slow, the server seemed overwhelmed, and correcting it may create trouble for the person who made the mistake.

Does protecting someone from consequences ever justify benefiting from their error?

Explore this quandary