Meet In CommonNews

Local

As Bay Area Cities Break Up With Flock, Pushback to Surveillance Mounts in SF | KQED

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: KQED

As Bay Area cities set stricter guardrails or break up entirely with automated license plate reader tools like Flock in the face of intense criticism from constituents, many elected officials in San Francisco are doubling down on their support for the surveillance technology. From Mayor Daniel Lurie to supervisors like Matt Dorsey and other local Democratic Party leaders, they say the cameras have aided law enforcement and reduced crime. Critics say they are a gross invasion of privacy. Tensions over the city’s use of Flock have fueled protests and fiery public comment as San Francisco prepares to reconsider its contract with the controversial Atlanta-based company next February and as the election next month spurs widespread debate about artificial intelligence and surveillance technology. “I don’t feel safe being watched.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at KQED

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Security measures should be proportionate to demonstrated risks.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The stadium can ban violent fans by scanning every face at the gate. Would you walk in?

A stadium can use facial recognition to identify people banned for violence and shorten security lines. Every visitor would be scanned, error rates are not zero, and the resulting biometric data could become useful to police or advertisers.

How much privacy may a crowd be asked to trade for collective safety?

Explore this quandary