Meet In CommonNews

Local

Astoria’s Gizmo’s Retrocade catches second wind

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Astorian

Community outpouring of support keeps doors open for now In a Nov. 2 Facebook post, owner Roger Nikunen announced that Gizmo’s Retrocade would be closing its doors on Nov. 15. Nikunen, aka “Retro Rog,” cited “financial setbacks, declining sales, costly repairs, operational challenges and ongoing problems in our downtown neighborhood” as key reasons behind his decision to close the arcade. Following the announcement, Nikunen said he and the retro arcade have received an outpour of community support. So much so, that just three days later, Nikunen announced on Nov. 5 that the arcade will be keeping its doors open and its arcade machines plugged in for the “foreseeable future.” “I’m actually excited for the future, though it’s still uncertain,” Nikunen said. Since Nikunen announced Gizmo’s closing, he said he has received support from patrons, some of whom donated $5,000 to help keep the arcade open through the month.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Astorian

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A workable temporary compromise is often better than delaying all action.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A better public school is one borrowed address away. Would you use it?

Your child is struggling at the assigned school. A grandparent lives inside the boundary of a much stronger public school and offers to let you use their address. The desired school has limited places and verifies residency unevenly.

Can a parent's duty justify taking an opportunity allocated by an unfair boundary?

Explore this quandary