Meet In CommonNews

Local

B.C. track star Matti Erickson signs pro contract with Nike

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Kitimat Northern Sentinel

Now that his college career is over, Matti Erickson’s race is only just starting. The Nelson, B.C., track star has signed a pro contract with Nike Swoosh TC, which is the sportswear giant’s distance running team. The deal will see Erickson compete for Nike through 2028. Erickson graduated from the University of Oregon this year and considered becoming a math teacher, but ultimately decided that, at 23 years old, he still has plenty of track ahead of him. “I thought I’m just too far along in this journey to give up now,” he said. “I have unfinished business, unaccomplished goals that I still feel like I have the ability to accomplish even if they feel far away. And so for those reasons, I just feel like I’ve got too much in me still. I’m so unproven that it was no-brainer really.” Erickson was a star for the Oregon Ducks, during which he was also the first Canadian athlete to sign a name, image and likeness deal with Nike.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Kitimat Northern Sentinel

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Urgent public needs can justify simplifying normal approval procedures.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary