Meet In CommonNews

Local

Better Election Funding

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: North Coast Journal

Editor: The 2026 midterm elections cost nearly $12 billion, a record. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision enabled this. That decision allowed the formation of political action committees (PACs) that can accept large political donations for distribution to favored candidates regardless of the $3,500 individual donation limit. It allows the wealthy greater political influence. The 50 largest donors contributed $2.8 billion, about 23 percent of the total. But what is the practical magnitude of $12 billion? It exceeds the budget of 14 states and is more than the $11 billion the federal government spent in 2025 on research in cancer ($7.2 billion) plus Alzheimer’s and dementia ($3.8 billion). It could form a $12 billion pool of government money to replace PAC funding that would be available to candidates of all types under specific rules. Just think if the US government were actually able to eliminate PACs and put in place a capped funding pool, say at $3.75 billion.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at North Coast Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Schools should evaluate new teaching approaches by actual improvements in learning.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The buffet is unlimited while you are inside. Can one sandwich leave in your pocket?

An expensive hotel brunch advertises unlimited food but forbids takeout. You are full, yet quietly assembling a sandwich for later would cost the hotel almost nothing. Several trays will likely be discarded after service.

Does preventing waste justify ignoring the boundary of a bargain?

Explore this quandary