Meet In CommonNews

Local

Boyer wins re-election as common pleas judge

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Perry County Tribune

Unofficial vote totals from the Perry County Board of Elections for the Nov. 3 election show incumbent county Common Pleas Judge Tina M. Boyer retaining her seat in the face of a challenge by local attorney Steve Carr. With only provisional ballots left to be accounted for, Boyer has 6,031 votes to Carr’s total of 5,737.“I’m very grateful to the voters of Perry County who put their trust in me for another six years,” Boyer told The Perry County Tribune after her victory at the polls. “I’m definitely humbled by the support I received. I had a group of wonderful people surrounding me and supporting me, and I’m very grateful for all of that. I look forward to serving Perry County. I’m very proud of this county. It’s my home, and always has been, and I’m very proud of it, and happy to be the common pleas court judge for another six years.”Carr said, “My family and I are deeply appreciative of the tremendous support of all of our friends and neighbors in Perry County. Thank you all!”

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Perry County Tribune

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Studies used in public decisions should include people from varied backgrounds.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You both hate the invitation. Which partner has to become the excuse?

A couple receives an invitation neither wants to accept. One suggests claiming the other is ill, reasoning that friends will question a vague excuse but respect sickness. The proposed patient dislikes lying but also wants to stay home.

Is a shared lie fair when only one person's reputation carries it?

Explore this quandary