Meet In CommonNews

Local

Brooklyn building collapse: Day 3 brings focus to investigation, support for displaced families

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Brooklyn Paper

As the third day of response to a deadly building collapse in Flatbush gets underway, the neighborhood is beginning the difficult transition from rescue efforts to recovery, with investigators working to determine what caused the disaster and community members rallying to support those affected. Eight people, including two children, were killed when a three-story building at 1321 Flatbush Avenue collapsed into an adjacent construction site at 2625 Bedford Avenue shortly after 4 p.m. on Nov. 11. Another 18 people were injured, including four firefighters, according to officials. The victims were identified as Nicole Daniela Salvada Rodriguez, 8; Kevin Santiago Reyes Gonzalez, 10; Gabriel Siguencia, 22; Barry Mamadou, 23; Jose Luis Caguana Cosquillo, 26; Edgar Sapon, 26; Juan Daniel Salvada Guzman, 31; and Ndiaye Mamadou, 31.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Brooklyn Paper

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Teams owe supporters honest explanations during long periods of poor results.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous review could cost a coworker a promotion. Do you sign your name?

A company requests anonymous feedback about a colleague being considered for promotion. You have serious concerns based on direct experience, but anonymity prevents them from asking questions or understanding the context of your criticism.

Does honest criticism require accepting personal accountability for it?

Explore this quandary