Meet In CommonNews

Local

Byron York: Trump Yields On Immigration Enforcement

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Herald-Star

There has long been a deep divide between the parties on deportation policy. For many Republicans, if a person is in the United States illegally, in violation of federal immigration law, that’s enough for that person to be removed. For many Democrats, if that same person is in the country illegally, but — after committing the crime of entering illegally — has not committed any additional crimes, that person should be allowed to stay. That disagreement is at the core of the current fight over the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement. In the first year of the administration, federal agents famously pursued the “worst of the worst,” going after illegal immigrants who not only entered the country illegally but went on to commit heinous crimes while here. Republicans argued, convincingly, that those people should never have been allowed to stay in the country long enough to commit new crimes.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Herald-Star

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A workable temporary compromise is often better than delaying all action.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A patient records every doctor visit for their followers. Can the doctor refuse to be filmed?

A patient with a large social-media following livestreams their health journey and wants to record every appointment. They say the videos help others and keep doctors accountable. Their physician finds the camera distracting and worries that casual remarks will be edited out of context.

Whose comfort should control a conversation about one person's body and another person's work?

Explore this quandary