Meet In CommonNews

Local

California college caves to woke students by canceling mascot after 90 years

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: New York Post

A prominent California university is severing ties with its nearly century-old mascot, pulling the pin on a 92-year-old tradition following student backlash over colonial history. The University of San Francisco announced Friday that “The Don” — a costumed figure sporting a pencil mustache and a green Spanish-style hat that has patrolled the sidelines since 1932 — will officially step aside at the start of the spring 2027 semester. In his place, the college will introduce a wolf, though its athletic teams will still retain the traditional “Dons” nickname. The mascot originally honored Don Francisco de Haro, the first mayor of Yerba Buena before it became San Francisco. While the Spanish honorific translates to “of noble origin,” the figure sparked widespread debate in 2022 when USF’s student government passed a formal resolution demanding its removal, arguing the character symbolized the exploitation and subjugation of California’s Indigenous people.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at New York Post

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

New Castle News · New Castle, DE

College students charged for reported weed smoking

Five Westminster College students are facing charges after they reportedly were caught smoking marijuana in the New Wilmington Borough park.Borough police Chief Eric Jewell said the incident occurred in early September. Charges were filed Monday with District Judge Rick Russo.kAmy6H6== D2:5 96 H2D A2EC@==:?8 E92E 6G6?:?8 2?5 962C5 ?@:D6D 7C@> E96 49:=5C6?’D A=2J8C@F?5 2C62 @7 E96 p5>:C2= #@36CE $9F>2<6C !2C< @77 $@FE9 }6H r2DE=6 $EC66E]k^Am kAm%96 A2C< H2D DE:== @A6?[ 2?5 96 5C@G6 @?E@ $@FE9 |2C<6E $EC66E 2?5 4@F=5 D>6== 3FC?65 >2C:;F2?2[ 96 D2:5] w6 4:C4=65 2C@F?5 2?5 A2C<65 E96? 2AAC@24965 E96 7:G6 H9@ H6C6 :? 2 4:C4=6 D>@<:?8 >2C:;F2?2[ 96 D2:5]k^AmkAmy6H6== D2:5 96 D2H D>@<:?8 56G:46D 2?5 >2C:;F2?2 :? A=2:? G:6H @? E96 8C@F?5] w6 4@?7:D42E65 EH@ 3@?8D[ 2 A:A6[ 2 4@FA=6 @7 8C:?56CD 2?5 @E96C A2C2A96C?2=:2[ 2?5 23@FE ad 8C2>D @7 >2C:;F2?2[ H9:49 :D =6DD E92? 2? @F?46[ 96 D2:5]k^AmkAm“|2C:;F2?2 :D DE:== :==682= :?

Community Poll

Governments should explain openly what they gave up in negotiated compromises.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your partner checks your location whenever you reply slowly. Is that caring or creepy?

A couple shares live phone locations for convenience and safety. One partner begins checking the map whenever a message goes unanswered, even though they have never agreed on when checking is appropriate.

Does granting access also grant permission to monitor?

Explore this quandary