Meet In CommonNews

Local

Canada’s former deputy Prime Minister describes U.S. relationship, navigating foreign policy

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Stanford Daily

Former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland opened up about betrayal, alliances and making hard choices while in office at Encina Hall this Monday. At the talk hosted by Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CCDRL), Freeland discussed her new book, “Unreliable Boyfriend: An Insider’s View of Dealing with a Chaotic Superpower, Plutocrats, and Other Complicated People,” which describes the U.S.-Canada relationship from the perspective of a Canadian diplomat. She also recounted her experience in Justin Trudeau’s government and offered perspective on international political economy and North American politics. Without preface, Freeland macaronically responded to her first question of the event in fluent French, before quickly changing back to English. “Canadians are feeling more Canadian than at any time in my lifetime,” she said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Stanford Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Allegations should not be treated as proven until a fair process establishes the facts.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary