Meet In CommonNews

Local

Carolina Martinez Valdez turned 100 this year

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Madras Pioneer

and celebrated the milestone with her family at the Mazatlan restaurant in Madras. Valdez was born on Aug. 30, 1926, in Nuevo Repuebleo, a well-known neighborhood in the southern part of Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. She grew up with five brothers and a sister. She migrated with her family to Corpus Christi, Texas, at age 17. That is where Valdez continued living and eventually began raising her own family. Valdez and her family were migrant workers for several years, picking produce like peaches, pears, plums, whole mint, potatoes and beans. For this work, they traveled from Texas to California and then Central Oregon every year. In total, Valdez had five children whom she raised as a stay-at-home mother. She is also a Jehovah’s Witness and is regularly visited by people with whom she attends church. Valdez and her family moved to Culver in 1997, before moving in with her daughter, Irma Symons, after her husband’s death in March 2010.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Madras Pioneer

Featured places to meet in Nuevo, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

No featured venues are available for this city yet. You can choose a meeting place when creating a Roundtable.

City guide for Nuevo, CA

Community Poll

Schools should be judged on student wellbeing as well as academic results.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary