Meet In CommonNews

Local

Celebrity Perfume and Beauty Lines: Who Actually Owns the Formula

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: News 7 Channel

Most celebrity fragrance and beauty lines rest on contracts, not on mixing benches. The star supplies a name, an image and a marketing story. A licensed company develops the products and runs the business. Coty reported that products making up 37 percent of its fiscal 2026 sales were sold under exclusive license agreements, per its Form 10-K. The structure explains who holds what. Coty's filing describes a roster of brands, some owned and some licensed, and says the company works with licensors to promote brand image on the licensed side. The takeaway for a shopper is simple: a line with a famous name often has a corporate maker behind it. How stars talk to reporters about such deals is its own question, examined in the ethics of the celebrity access interview. Ownership facts sit in public documents. LVMH places Fenty Beauty by Rihanna inside its Perfumes and Cosmetics division.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at News 7 Channel

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Scarce treatments should be allocated by medical need rather than ability to pay.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your best friend is an AI that profits when you stay lonely. Is the friendship real?

A lonely adult considers an AI companion their closest confidant. The service is always patient and supportive, but the company profits when users spend more time engaged with it.

Does a comforting system have a duty to make itself less necessary?

Explore this quandary