Meet In CommonNews

Local

Chancellor finalist John Coleman addresses free expression, shared governance at public forum

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Badger Herald

Former University of Wisconsin political science department chair John Coleman, one of the three finalists for UW chancellor, met at Memorial Union Thursday for a public Q&A forum where he addressed different priorities for the position and his experience. Coleman is currently provost and executive vice chancellor for academic affairs at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, where he is also a political science professor. Previously, he served as the dean of the College of Liberal Arts at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities for nearly a decade and was a political science faculty member at UW for 22 years, according to chancellor search. “We’re at a particularly momentous period in American higher education history in this country and in the world,” Coleman said. “This university is so well poised to do great, amazing things, and I am so grateful to this university for everything that it built for me.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Badger Herald

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Polluters should pay cleanup costs even when the damage occurred many years ago.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An app can text exactly like someone you lost. Would you keep talking to it?

A service can create a conversational likeness from a deceased person's messages and recordings. A grieving family member finds it comforting, although the deceased never consented to this use of their data.

Can comfort justify creating a voice the dead never authorized?

Explore this quandary