Meet In CommonNews

Local

Clemmons unveils new veterans memorial marker

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Clemmons Courier

The Village of Clemmons unveiled its new marker dedicated to honoring the sacrifice and bravery of local veterans on Tuesday, just ahead of Veteran’s Day. The unveiling included remarks from representatives of the local Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post, 9010. “For those of us who have worn the uniform, a veterans memorial carries a very personal meaning. When we look upon a memorial such as this, we do not simply see stone, brick, concrete, flags or names. We see people. We remember friends. We remember brothers in arms, sisters in arms. We remember those who we served beside, and we remember those who never made it home,” said post 9010 Senior Vice Commander Matt Merckson, tearing up. “Behind every name is a story, behind every veteran is a family and behind every sacrifice are those spouses, children and other loved ones who also carried part of the burden of their memorial service.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Clemmons Courier

Featured places to meet in Clemmons, NC

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Applebee's

Applebee's 6310 Allegacy Way Clemmons, NC, 27012 US

Arby's

Arby's 2541 Lewisville-Clemmons Road Clemmons, NC, 27012 US

Biscuitville

Biscuitville 6405 Sessions Court Clemmons, NC, 27012 US

Bojangles'

Bojangles' 1423 Lewisville Clemmons Road Clemmons, NC, 27012 US

City guide for Clemmons, NC

Community Poll

Equipment rules should preserve fair competition even when they limit innovation.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary