Meet In CommonNews

Local

Colorado voters approve Amendment 87, imposing higher income taxes on top earners

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Cherry Creek News

Colorado voters narrowly approved Amendment 87 in the Nov. 5 election, with the Associated Press calling the race Friday morning after more than 51% of votes favored the measure. The constitutional amendment removes the state’s flat-tax requirement and establishes a tiered income tax system that raises rates on top earners, projected to generate $2 billion in additional revenue by 2027-28. The measure will raise the state’s corporate and individual income tax rate to 7.4% on income above $500,000, with the rate gradually increasing to 8.4% on income above $1 million, according to the measure’s text. The higher rates apply to the top 3% of earners, while taxpayers earning less than $500,000 annually will see a reduction in their income tax rate, according to a fiscal analysis by nonpartisan state legislative staff. That analysis projected the measure would generate $2 billion in additional revenue for the state by the 2027-28 fiscal year.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Cherry Creek News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Public contracts should consider quality and reliability, even when the lowest bid costs less.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An old friend refuses to use someone's new name. Do you correct them at the reunion?

At a reunion, an old friend repeatedly uses the name a former classmate had years ago. They say shared history gives the old name affectionate meaning; the classmate has clearly introduced themselves with a different name.

When does preserving your shared past deny who someone is now?

Explore this quandary