Meet In CommonNews

Local

Community gets chance to meet police chief candidates

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Quincy Herald Whig

QUINCY — The community had an opportunity Friday to hear directly from the three final candidates in the running to head up the Quincy Police Department. The city’s Board of Fire and Police Commissioners held a public debate-style meeting with the candidates in the City Hall’s council chambers, with Great River Honor Flight chairman Carlos Fernandez acting as moderator, asking the three candidates a series of prepared questions. The candidates are: Wendell Watts, who recently left the Jackson, Mississippi Police Department as assistant chief; Steve Hebbe, currently the chief of police in Farmington, New Mexico; and Mike Dobis, the current chief ranger for the Tennessee State Parks. After opening comments were each candidate laid out their personal and professional histories, Fernandez presented a variety of questions ranging from what the first 90 days of each tenure would look like to the importance of community policing.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Quincy Herald Whig

Featured places to meet in Jackson, MS

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Amerigo

Amerigo 622 Duling Avenue Jackson, MS, 39216 US

Aplos

Aplos 4500 I 55 Jackson, MS, 39211 US

City guide for Jackson, MS

Community Poll

Correcting clear officiating errors is worth some interruption to a game's flow.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary