Meet In CommonNews

Local

Constitution change funding Minnesota schools appears likely to pass

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

ROCHESTER — Minnesota voters on Tuesday approved an amendment to the state’s constitution that will allow schools to receive more revenue from the Permanent School Fund. By midnight Wednesday, more than 73% of voters had supported the amendment. Ballots on which the question was left unanswered were counted against the amendment. The voter-approved increase in revenue will start to be distributed to schools in July 2027. According to the Minnesota School Boards Association, the fund provided $68 per student to districts in 2025. If the amendment had been in place at the time, that per-pupil funding would have been $101. Established in the 1800s from revenue generated by the sale of timber and other natural resources as a way to support education, the fund had grown to $2.4 billion by 2025. In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature created a task force to investigate the maintenance of the fund.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Pine and Lakes Echo Journal

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Public information should be withheld only when there is a clear reason for confidentiality.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You spot your friend's partner on a dating app. Do you send the screenshot?

While browsing a dating app, you see the long-term partner of a close friend. The profile looks active, but you have no way to know whether it is current, permitted, fake, or simply forgotten.

When does loyalty require sharing uncertain information?

Explore this quandary