Meet In CommonNews

Local

Contract awarded for new ‘Little Bridge’ over Coosa River

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Gadsden Messenger

A contract has been awarded for the replacement of the Gilbert’s Ferry Bridge, commonly known as the “Little Bridge,” which carries northbound traffic on Alabama 77 over the Coosa River between Southside and Rainbow City. Transportation Director John Cooper awarded the contract to Scott Bridge Company of Opelika following approval by Gov. Kay Ivey last week. Ivey announced the award Monday. The project will replace the aging bridge with a new two-lane structure designed to improve traffic flow along the heavily traveled corridor. “For almost 90 years, the Gilbert’s Ferry Bridge has carried increasing traffic volume across the Coosa River between Southside and Rainbow City,” Ivey said. “Even after the addition of the larger southbound bridge, congestion remains a problem for northbound traffic on the older bridge.” The existing truss bridge was constructed in 1939 and originally carried traffic in both directions.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Gadsden Messenger

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Countries should consider serious effects on people abroad when setting domestic policies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

An app can text exactly like someone you lost. Would you keep talking to it?

A service can create a conversational likeness from a deceased person's messages and recordings. A grieving family member finds it comforting, although the deceased never consented to this use of their data.

Can comfort justify creating a voice the dead never authorized?

Explore this quandary