Meet In CommonNews

Local

Counterpoint: Congress must close dangerous hemp loophole

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: MinnPost

In 2022, five 14-year-old girls in Des Moines, Iowa, ended up dizzy, vomiting and with racing hearts after buying and consuming colorful delta-8 gummies branded Death by Gummy Bears, made by a Minnesota company called Northland Vapor. The girls later told police they didn’t know what they were. One girl was paranoid and kept repeating that she didn’t want to die. Two were later treated in the emergency room. The FDA issued a warning letter to Northland Vapor after the Iowa incident and separately after a 23-year-old man died from consuming the same product. Minnesota’s own Board of Pharmacy sued the company, saying its gummies violated state THC limits. Litigation is ongoing. This entire ordeal occurred because of a federal loophole nobody in Congress intended to create. Recently, Congress voted to keep that loophole open for at least one more month. The root of the issue dates back to the 2018 Farm Bill, which defined legal hemp using a narrow measure of delta-9 THC content.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at MinnPost

Featured places to meet in Des Moines, IA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

801 Chophouse

801 Chophouse 801 Grand Avenue Des Moines, IA, 50309 US

A&W

A&W Des Moines, IA US

Abelardo's

Abelardo's 5525 Douglas Avenue Des Moines, IA, 50310 US

City guide for Des Moines, IA

Community Poll

People should be able to challenge automated decisions that affect their opportunities.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You find a rare library book your father kept for forty years. Do you return it anonymously?

While clearing your father's attic, you find a rare book stamped by the local library and due in 1986. The library would be thrilled to recover it, but returning it openly would expose a secret he apparently kept for decades—and might produce a spectacular overdue fine.

Does making an old wrong right require admitting who did it?

Explore this quandary