Meet In CommonNews

Local

Crashout Teas: A Risk Worth Taking

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: obusignal.com

Features Crashout Teas: A Risk Worth Taking November 3, 2026 by OBU Signal By Claire Burris, Staff Writer Starting a business in college requires a willingness to take risks and recognize opportunities beyond the classroom. For Roman Lancaster and Abigail Drennan, Crashout Teas has provided an opportunity to do just that. What began as an idea has developed into a business that has challenged their abilities, shaped their college experience and influenced the way they envisioned their future. When Lancaster and Drennan first established Crashout Teas, they could not have anticipated everything that would come with running a business. The process required them to move beyond the initial excitement of starting something new and understand the responsibilities that come with sustaining it.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at obusignal.com

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Large technology projects should demonstrate local benefits before receiving public incentives.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You wear an expensive outfit once and return it spotless. Clever or dishonest?

You buy an expensive outfit for a single event, keep it spotless, and return it the next day. The store's generous policy allows returns without asking whether an item was worn.

Does exploiting a policy differ from breaking a rule?

Explore this quandary