Meet In CommonNews

Local

Daily Happenings for Nov. 13

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Herald-Star

POLICE REPORTS STEUBENVILLE POLICE Big boom: Callers reported “a loud explosion” in the 700 block of Oakmont Wednesday. Residents initially thought it was a transformer and reported seeing “what appeared to be sparks falling down outside,” though a third individual suggested it had something to do with a nearby residence. Police attempted to speak with the occupants but no one came to the door, though once they walked away the porch lights and other lights inside the home mysteriously turned off. While they were searching the area police said they spotted a vehicle parked in front of the resident with “what appeared to be a firework wrapper” as well as “possible damage to the passenger side and roof” of the vehicle. They tried a second time to make contact with someone inside the home “but again no one answered the door.” Scammed: A Columbia Avenue resident said a caller claiming to sell weight loss medication convinced her to give them her credit card information.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Herald-Star

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Publicly funded stadiums should provide clear, measurable benefits to local residents.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary