Meet In CommonNews

Local

Dare to Care’s Men’s Mental Health Gala sparks conversation, awareness

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Setonian

Students socialize at Dare to Care's Men's Mental Health Gala in the University Center event room. | Photo by Tahir Wilcox | The Setonian Features Dare to Care’s Men’s Mental Health Gala sparks conversation, awareness The gala brought students together to raise awareness and challenge stigmas. Sometimes, the hardest part of addressing mental health is starting the conversation. Creating a safe space for expression can make all the difference. Dare to Care hosted its third annual Men's Mental Health Gala on Monday, bringing students together to raise awareness about men’s mental health. "The topic of men’s mental health has a strong history of being addressed in individual departments and areas, but because these educational efforts were so fragmented, the effective reach of each group was limited," Anthony Turon, assistant dean of students, said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Setonian

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Supporters should be consulted before major changes in their club's ownership or location.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary