Meet In CommonNews

Local

David Rubenstein and Faculty Panel Discuss the Declaration of Independence at 250

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Chicago Maroon

David Rubenstein, chair of the University of Chicago’s Board of Trustees, moderated a faculty panel on November 5 focused on the history and legacy of the Declaration of Independence 250 years after it was written. Rubenstein is himself a collector of historical documents, including a 1297 copy of the Magna Carta and original copies of the Emancipation Proclamation and Declaration of Independence—one copy of which was donated to be put on display on the ground floor of the David Rubenstein Forum. The panel, held at the Rubenstein Forum, included Steven Pincus, the Thomas E. Donnelly Professor of British History, Alison LaCroix, the Robert Newton Reid Professor of Law, associate professor of political science Ruth Bloch Rubin, and Deputy Dean of the Humanities Division Eric Slauter.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Chicago Maroon

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Documentaries should disclose editing choices that substantially affect how events are understood.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Your anonymous gift could inspire millions more if you reveal your name. Do you?

A donor wants to make a transformative gift without recognition. The charity believes announcing the gift and the donor's identity would encourage matching contributions and help far more people.

Can the opportunity to create more good outweigh a preference for privacy?

Explore this quandary