Meet In CommonNews

Local

Democrats float to top of dome

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Minot Daily News

On a richly colored autumn afternoon, the Capitol was all abuzz, and I went forth expecting the breaking news of the day to be on the House side, with Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth’s impeachment vote. Pete escaped the scythe of impeachment 211-204, with the outgoing House Republican majority saving his neck. Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and 10 other Democrats missed the vote. Few in the House are happy with the war in Iran, so he may face another date with fate in 2027, when a massive Democratic majority comes to town with close to 260 members, compared to 165 Republicans. (Some races are still undecided.) On the Senate side, Democrats looked ready to float to the top of the Capitol dome’s Italian fresco murals. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York could not stop smiling the whole day through, walking with several of the senators-elect that arrived for orientation. Count them: Eleven new faces graced the halls by the Ohio Clock, a symbol of the Senate.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Minot Daily News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Communities should usually repair existing infrastructure before building replacements.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary