Meet In CommonNews

Local

Democrats strategize on how to deliver on midterm mandate

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The US Inquirer

Democrats received the message loud and clear from the midterm elections that Americans want results, not “shallow litmus tests,” as Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro put it at a conference in Denver this week. But it was evident that Democrats, who gathered at a summit on the way forward as they take control of the House and Senate next year, are still working out just how to achieve those results while President Trump is still in the White House. Shapiro helped Democrats flip four House seats in his state, and he spoke after an election that delivered decisive majorities to Democrats in the Senate and the House. He said voters had rejected “chaos” and “corruption” and are demanding results-focused governance. Shapiro urged congressional Democrats to focus on lowering costs, building affordable housing, protecting consumers and expanding economic opportunity — and not on ideological fights.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The US Inquirer

Featured places to meet in Denver, PA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Dunkin'

Dunkin' 2055 North Reading Road Denver, PA, 17517 US

City guide for Denver, PA

Community Poll

People should always be told when they are communicating with a machine.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

The restaurant forgot your expensive entrée. Do you point it out?

After a crowded dinner, you notice the restaurant omitted your most expensive entrée from the bill. Service was slow, the server seemed overwhelmed, and correcting it may create trouble for the person who made the mistake.

Does protecting someone from consequences ever justify benefiting from their error?

Explore this quandary