Meet In CommonNews

Local

Dems are in control of the Arizona Capitol; here’s what we know about their agenda

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Phoenix New Times

Politics & GovernmentDems are in control of the Arizona Capitol; here’s what we know about their agenda It’s been six decades since the party held both legislative chambers and the governor’s office. By Sasha Hupka | VotebeatNovember 11, 2026 The Arizona Capitol building. Gage Skidmore/Flickr/CC BY-SA 2.0 Add New Timesas a preferred source on Google Audio By Carbonatix Wherever We're Needed. We're There. From the stories making headlines to the restaurants, music and culture that make Phoenix one of a kind, New Times is there. Help us raise $25,000 by December 31 to keep independent local journalism going strong in 2027. Support us today Progress to goal $2,850 $25,000 This article was originally published by Votebeat, a nonprofit news organization covering local election administration and voting access. For decades, Arizona’s election and voting policies have been shaped largely by Republicans. After Democrats’ earth-shattering wins in the 2026 election, that’s about to change.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Phoenix New Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Improving employee pay should take priority over increasing shareholder payouts.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Software says a student cheated with AI. Is that enough to fail the paper?

A teacher suspects several essays were written with AI. Detection software marks one student's work as highly likely to be generated, but the software is known to make mistakes and the student denies using it.

How should responsibility be assigned when evidence is powerful but unreliable?

Explore this quandary