Meet In CommonNews

Local

Did anger over data centers lead to Nevada's blue tsunami?

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Nevada Independent

On Election Day, voters in Boulder City overwhelmingly rejected a ballot question that would have allowed data centers on city-owned land in the Eldorado Valley. With nearly 71 percent of voters saying no, opposition to the question outperformed statewide ballot questions about abortion rights and voter ID. But the results also show the issue didn't sort neatly by party. Boulder City's decisive vote came in a town where registered Republicans outnumber Democrats more than 2 to 1, and the same voters comfortably re-elected a mayor who had expressed openness to a data center. Nationally, data center opponents won all but one of 41 local ballot measures last week, according to preliminary tallies. But an analysis by Heatmap, a climate and energy news site, found that communities fighting data centers largely kept voting as they had before. In Conneaut, Ohio, about two-thirds of voters backed a local moratorium while splitting between the two candidates for governor.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Nevada Independent

Featured places to meet in Nevada, OH

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

City guide for Nevada, OH

Community Poll

Adults should generally be free to accept personal risks that do not substantially harm others.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You wear an expensive outfit once and return it spotless. Clever or dishonest?

You buy an expensive outfit for a single event, keep it spotless, and return it the next day. The store's generous policy allows returns without asking whether an item was worn.

Does exploiting a policy differ from breaking a rule?

Explore this quandary