Meet In CommonNews

Local

Dodge County approves 2026 budget

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: wdtimes.com

JUNEAU — On Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors approved the Dodge County’s 2027 budget.The $213 million budget includes a $39.2 million tax levy, which is an increase of around $1.1 million. But the mill rate of $3.29 per $1,000 of assessed value is a 6% decrease from last year’s budget.Cameron Clapper of Dodge County noted that the County’s equalized property values came in at $11.9 billion, up from last year’s $11.1 billion, an increase of 7.27%.“While a homeowner with a house valued at $300,000 would see a tax levy of $986.27, a homeowner with a $100,000 house would see a levy of $328.75,” Clapper said. “The (final budget) meeting went really smoothly. It lasted roughly two hours or less.”Clapper said there were four amendments; the first two were “housekeeping items” within the budget. He said the other two amendments dealt with the cost-of-living adjustment for county employees.“We were able to bring the cost of living from 2% to 3.13%,” Clapper said.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at wdtimes.com

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Health technologies should demonstrate better patient outcomes before widespread adoption.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A disgraced billionaire's name is on the beloved campus library. Does it come down?

A major donor funded a beloved public building decades ago. New evidence shows they also caused serious harm that was legal and accepted by many peers at the time. Removing the name may jeopardize future donations.

What does an institution owe the truth when its history funded the present?

Explore this quandary