Meet In CommonNews

Local

Drexel exhibit showcases LGBTQ+ representation in video games

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Philadelphia Gay News

An interactive exhibition at Drexel University’s Pearlstein Gallery features playable gaming consoles and immersive encounters that help visitors experience video games as more than entertainment. “Escape > Control > Play: The Art of the Video Game,” which can be viewed through Dec. 12, explores how games challenge cultural norms. “Queer Games >> Histories + Futures,” a display curated by professors Adrienne Shaw and Ari Gass, contextualizes how video games have historically empowered the LGBTQ+ community within the larger political landscape of the United States. One of Shaw’s favorite points on the LGBTQ+ video games timeline is from 1989: “Caper in the Castro,” a mystery featuring lesbian detective Tracker McDyke who searches for her kidnapped friend — a drag queen named Tessy LaFemme. Creator CM Ralph published the game via floppy disk for peer-to-peer sharing and made it available on virtual bulletin boards.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Philadelphia Gay News

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Preserving historic places can justify limiting redevelopment.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You love the free sample but will never buy it. How many times may you circle back?

A warehouse store is offering delicious samples. You have no intention of purchasing the product, but the employee seems bored and has trays to spare. After taking two, you consider removing your jacket and returning for a third.

Is exploiting generosity wrong when the giver appears not to care?

Explore this quandary