Meet In CommonNews

Local

E-Discovery Basics: How a Legal Hold Becomes a Production Set

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: 3G Times

E-discovery is the process of finding, preserving, and handing over electronically stored information, or ESI, in a lawsuit. In federal court, the frame comes from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Rules 26 and 37 set the duty to preserve and the scope of what changes hands. The work runs from legal hold to production set, and the EDRM model maps the stages. Each stage has its own job: identify data, preserve it, collect it, process it, review it, and produce it. Skipping a stage is costly. Under Rule 37(e), lost data that should have been kept can bring curative court orders, and worse if a court finds intent. This connects to our earlier piece, How Technology-Assisted Review Actually Works — and What Rule 26 and Rule 502 Require Before You Deploy It. When does the duty to preserve data start? The duty starts when litigation is on the horizon. Rule 37(e) covers ESI that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at 3G Times

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Museums should actively seek histories missing from their existing collections.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You both hate the invitation. Which partner has to become the excuse?

A couple receives an invitation neither wants to accept. One suggests claiming the other is ill, reasoning that friends will question a vague excuse but respect sickness. The proposed patient dislikes lying but also wants to stay home.

Is a shared lie fair when only one person's reputation carries it?

Explore this quandary