Meet In CommonNews

Local

East Palo Alto councilmember caught messaging developer before policy vote

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Palo Alto Online

During a July debate over affordable housing, East Palo Alto City Council member Mark Dinan was involved in a message exchange with a developer who stood to financially benefit from the subsequent decision, according to documents obtained by this publication. The WhatsApp messages were revealed in a series of videos that the Weekly has received, which show project applicant Owen Byrd communicating with Dinan and another developer, Mike Kramer of Sand Hill Property Company, during a July 7 discussion over the city’s inclusionary housing rules, which require developers to devote a portion of units in new developments to below-market-rate housing. The topic has over the past years polarized council members, like Dinan, who consistently favored loosening the requirement and the council’s more senior members, Vice Mayor Ruben Abrica and Councilmember Carlos Romero, who supported maintaining the existing rules.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Palo Alto Online

Featured places to meet in East Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Starbucks

Starbucks 1745 East Bayshore Boulevard Palo Alto, CA, USA

Las michoacanitas

Las michoacanitas 2373 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

McDonald's

McDonald's 1721 East Bayshore Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

McDonald's

McDonald's 2401 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA, 94303 US

City guide for East Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

A merger should be approved only when there is a credible case that customers will benefit.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

You both hate the invitation. Which partner has to become the excuse?

A couple receives an invitation neither wants to accept. One suggests claiming the other is ill, reasoning that friends will question a vague excuse but respect sickness. The proposed patient dislikes lying but also wants to stay home.

Is a shared lie fair when only one person's reputation carries it?

Explore this quandary