Meet In CommonNews

Local

East Spencer starts data center ordinance

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Salisbury Post

EAST SPENCER — The East Spencer Board of Aldermen has started drafting a data center ordinance as they prepare for the possible annexation of the Long Ferry Road data center development. Project construction timelines and specifics remain uncertain, but town discussions and public permitting offer more detail on the expected building size, water use and electricity sources. Over the last few months, ground has been moving at the Long Ferry Road data center site. The development company Edged has started erosion control and initial preparations for substation construction, according to Rowan County public permitting records. However, in April 2026, the county said Edged would not build the data center until an end user is finalized. As it stands, the property is still under Rowan County zoning. East Spencer, Spencer, Rowan County and the developer had an agreement that the property would be annexed into the towns, according to Salisbury Post reporting in April 2026.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Salisbury Post

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Changing a public decision in response to new evidence is a sign of responsible leadership.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A $300 package lands at your door by mistake. Do you keep it?

A package containing expensive headphones arrives with your address but another person's name. The retailer says it has already replaced the order and does not ask you to return it.

If no one appears to lose, what still makes keeping it right or wrong?

Explore this quandary