Meet In CommonNews

Local

Editorial: Fair game, but not at everyone’s expense

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Times Leader

We’ve long chronicled the challenges and triumphs of those who struggle with mental or physical issues, young and old, born with hurdles to overcome or developing them through accidents or old age. When the since-closed White Haven Center came under scrutiny for state cost-cutting reasons in 2001, family members of residents in the facility told us why they wanted what it offered: a home for those grappling with severe intellectual disabilities. One mother lamented her daughter’s frequent seizures and inability to recognize danger, requiring 24-hour-a-day care. A sister spoke of how her brother was cared for at home until he got too big to handle in bursts of violence. “My brother’s strong, but he has the mind of a 3-year-old.” We chronicled the nearly three months of work behind a Hazleton Christmas show starring clients at United Rehabilitation Services (also closed), a place that helped people with a wide range of mental health and learning problems.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Times Leader

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Related coverage

Community Poll

Private companies delivering public services should face the same transparency duties as public agencies.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary