Meet In CommonNews

Local

Evanescence and the Beautiful Foolishness of Things: An artistic way to fight seasonal depression

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: The Tufts Daily

Arts | Columns Evanescence and the Beautiful Foolishness of Things: An artistic way to fight seasonal depression Graphic edited by Israel Hernandez. I don’t understand fallback time. Never have, never will. Though I greatly appreciate the single extra hour of sleep during midterm season and walking out to pitch black after my 6 p.m. class with my flash on, I doubt the ‘pros’ outweigh the disruption of natural circadian rhythms and the seasonal depression that sticks for the remainder of the gloomy, harsh New England winter. This is usually when therapists introduce light therapy, in which a blasting beam is flashed in your face to incinerate those winter blues. Luckily, there’s a gentler and more thoughtful way to find light. It exists in the Peabody Essex Museum’s ongoing exhibition titled “Isamu Noguchi: ‘I am not a designer,’” and in the gentle glow of Isamu Noguchi’s Akari light sculptures.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at The Tufts Daily

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

Communities should actively welcome newcomers even when local services must adapt.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

A pricey AI tutor can turn B students into A students. Should schools let them use it?

An effective AI tutor adapts to each student and dramatically improves performance, but its subscription is expensive. A public school cannot provide it to everyone and worries that allowing its use will deepen existing inequality.

Should access be limited when a beneficial tool cannot yet be shared fairly?

Explore this quandary