Meet In CommonNews

Local

“Even Arnold Schwarzenegger Is Not Good Enough to Kill Me”: Van Damme Had One Rule About Which Action Star Could Take Him Out

Meet in Common connects news with real conversations. Use ThinkMatch to arrange a Roundtable and meet people to discuss this story.

Source: Fortress of Solitude

In action movies, there’s no shortage of knockouts and annihilations. Yet even amid all the chaos, bloodshed, and destruction, Jean-Claude Van Damme had one strict rule: only one action star would be allowed to kill him in a film. “We ended up discussing this,” writer-director Sheldon Lettich revealed (as per Nick de Semlyen’s The Last Action Heroes: The Triumphs, Flops, and Feuds of Hollywood’s Kings of Carnage ). “He said, ‘Bruce Willis? No. Wesley Snipes? Forget about it. Even Arnold Schwarzenegger is not good enough to kill me. But Stallone? I worship Stallone. He can do it.’” Lettich worked with Van Damme on films like Bloodsport, Double Impact, and The Order; needless to say, he understood the Belgian actor better than most. However, there was a ’90s movie where Van Damme considered breaking this rule: 1992’s Universal Soldier. As it turns out, Van Damme loved both the roles of Luc Deveraux and Andrew Scott.

This excerpt comes from the named source. Read the original for the full reporting.

Read the original at Fortress of Solitude

Featured places to meet in Palo Alto, CA

Explore these places and arrange a conversation through ThinkMatch.

Yutori

Yutori 3375 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA, 94306 US

Cafe Riace

Cafe Riace 200 Sheridan Avenue Palo Alto, CA, US

City guide for Palo Alto, CA

Community Poll

New health services should prioritize communities with the poorest existing access.

Share your view, then see how readers voted. No sign-in required. This poll is shared across stories.

Do you agree or disagree?

Choose one answer

Common Quandary

A Common Quandary to discuss

Another conversation to explore, separate from this news story.

Someone you love asks, “Do you think I’ll be okay?” What if you do not?

A relative with a poor prognosis asks whether you think they will recover. They seem to need reassurance, but you believe the odds are very low and do not want to spend the remaining time pretending.

Can preserving hope justify saying more than you believe?

Explore this quandary